Ledger / Audits / Follow-up Review
Follow-up Review
For the plant that altered a cell and wants the second window drawn on the same sheet as the first.
A follow-up is not a cheaper audit wearing a new name. It is a second window on a module we already know how to walk. The first findings letter stays on the table. We do not redraw history to make the new bars look kind.
You tell us what changed — a belt, a roster, a damper, a supplier — and when the change actually started, not when it was announced. We set a window that can be compared with the first without pretending the two periods were twins. If the original night counts are missing, we will not fill them in on the way back.
The paired charts are the whole point: old range on the left, new range on the right, dates written in full. A short note says what the second window is allowed to claim. If you want a full briefing again, ask for a findings briefing beside this review.
Write only if the first audit is already closed. A module we have never seen is a first audit, however small the change feels from inside the office.
| Who it is for | Clients who already closed a Module Performance Audit and then changed a shift, a machine, or a layout. |
|---|---|
| What you receive | A shorter log, paired charts, and a note on what moved and what the second window still cannot claim. |
| What we do not do | We do not treat the follow-up as proof that a change 'worked' if the new window is thinner than the first. |